Analysis of Comments on a New York Times Article Essay

The article, â€Å"Forced From Executive Pay to Hourly Wage,† which was composed by Michael Luo and was distributed in the New York Times last February 28, 2009, fundamentally recounted to the tale of individuals who used to procure five or six-figure sums every year, are currently being paid hourly least wages. One model in the article was the situation of Mark Cooper, who used to gain $70,000 as a security chief for Fortune 500 Company in the United States and who directs a financial plan of $1. 2 million. Nine months prior, he lost his activity and now he is winning $12 an hour in his position at his friend’s janitorial administrations organization. Despite the fact that the article itself is sufficiently engaging, it is additionally intriguing to take note of the readers’ remarks about it. Starting at now, there are 300 remarks about the article and after looking into the greater part of them, it tends to be gathered that every peruser who remarked had essentially various perspectives and conclusions about the story told in the New York Times article. Obviously, these perusers stick to various good codes which are seen through their reactions. All in all, the perusers who remarked on the article can be partitioned into two gatherings: one gathering praised the fearless demonstration of Mark Cooper while the other censured the style of composing and the unpretentious message that New York Times essayist utilized in the article. One of the reader’s who lauded the article story appreciated the fearlessness of Mr. Cooper as he had the option to bring down his pride and discovered approaches to accommodate his family regardless of whether it implies that he needs to scour toilets and have his compensation significantly decreased from five figures to a time-based compensation with no advantages. As it were, this gathering exceptionally respected the estimation of difficult work and starting from the very beginning again in an honorable manner. The vast majority of their remarks fundamentally showed that Mr. Cooper isn't the only one and that there are several Americans who have comparative â€Å"riches to rags† stories. These perusers, in light of their remarks, likewise accepted that there is no disgrace being poor up to one has a stately and legitimate activity. On other hand, the other gathering of perusers who remarked on the article condemned the New York Times for suggesting that the individuals who work manual occupations are lower types of people than the individuals who work clerical ones. They consider the to be as separating to Americans who have been experiencing their lives underneath the neediness line for quite a while even before the current financial emergency. For instance, one peruser mourned that article pretty much demonstrated that a $12-an-hour work is a disgusting method of living, which isn't accurate. What's more, one peruser didn't feel frustrated about Mr. Cooper and remarked that he had a ton to be grateful for in light of the fact that he lives in a better than expected house and had the option to carry on with a rich life. To this peruser, the financial emergency makes everybody in America equivalent since they are battling to get by. In any case, what’s basic in all the readers’ reactions is that they could all identify with the challenges experienced by the individuals delineated in the article. Indeed a portion of the perusers, who are clearly from various different backgrounds, shared their own accounts in their remarks. At the end of the day, the single factor that ties all the perusers who remarked is the hardship realized by the budgetary emergency in America. As it were, the article’s remarks show two things: one is that there are a great deal of Americans who are so used to a decent life that they are apparently found napping when an overwhelming money related emergency like this hits them and the other is that because of the emergency, most Americans would take on any activity just to endure. Be that as it may, the remarks additionally demonstrated that Americans are increasingly brought together in accomplishing a shared objective which is to recuperate from the overwhelming impacts of the emergency and modify their lives. Works Cited Luo, Mark. â€Å"Forced From Executive Pay to Hourly Wage. † 28 February 2009. New York Times. 4 March 2009 < http://www. nytimes. com/2009/03/01/us/01survival. html? pagewanted=1&_r=2&sq=executive%20janitor&st=cse&scp=1>.